Topic 1 Question #1
If there are similar questions about performance and security with the ready state product backlog items (PBIs), the product ownership analysis (POA) practitioner can utilize this information to:
Answer: A
Option Analysis:
A. This option is correct because identifying repeated performance and security concerns across ready state PBIs allows the POA practitioner to refine those requirements and update corresponding acceptance criteria to ensure those risks are addressed during delivery.
B. This option is incorrect because simply notifying the delivery team and customers of the affected PBIs does not resolve the identified performance and security gaps, which is the core responsibility of the POA practitioner in this scenario.
C. This option is incorrect because continuing to monitor PBIs without addressing known performance and security concerns, even if they have not exceeded average story age, leads to unmet requirements and avoidable post-launch issues.
D. This option is incorrect because conducting extra root cause analysis sessions with the iteration manager is not the primary, immediate action for a POA practitioner when recurring performance and security issues are found in ready PBIs, as this task aligns more with delivery leadership responsibilities. Key Concept:
A core responsibility of the Certified Product Ownership Analyst (CPOA) during product backlog refinement is to identify recurring non-functional requirement gaps such as performance and security concerns and update acceptance criteria to explicitly address these gaps before development begins. References:
Scrum Guide 2020, https://scrumguides.org/scrum-guide.html
Scrum Alliance Certified Product Ownership Analyst (CPOA) Handbook